Active Cases

A class action settlement has been proposed in litigation against Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (Quest), relating to the data breach occurring on or about November 26, 2016, and announced by Quest on or about December 12, 2016. The Incident involved an unauthorized third party accessing Quest’s MyQuest by Care360® internet application, and obtaining the personal information of approximately 34,000 patients. If you are among the approximately 34,000 patients impacted, you are a settlement class member.

If you donated money to Gospel for Asia between January 1, 2009 and March 22, 2019, you could receive money from a class action settlement.  The proposed settlement of a class action lawsuit may affect your rights.  Read the information contained on this website carefully because it explains decisions and actions you must take now.

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) alleges that INTEL discriminated against Female, Black, and Hispanic employees in select job titles in compensation. INTEL denies those claims. Ultimately, OFCCP and INTEL have agreed to resolve the issue through a Conciliation Agreement. A Conciliation Agreement is a legal document that explains the terms of an agreement between INTEL and OFCCP. As a result, affected class members may be eligible for back pay and salary adjustments. To be eligible for a payment and job, you must complete, sign, and return the form mailed to you. The form must be postmarked by December 30, 2019. There is no case website for this settlement.

Case No. 2:16cv5127, U.S. District of New Jersey, Newark.

The Action was filed against PVH Retail Stores LLC by plaintiffs Miguel Olmedo and Siobhan Morrow alleging PVH Retail engaged in deceptive advertising by advertising purportedly improper discounts on merchandise at Tommy Hilfiger Outlet Stores located in California. If you shopped at a Tommy Hilfiger Outlet Store located in California between April 18, 2014 and October 8, 2019, you may be eligible to receive a merchandise certificate for up to $10 off the purchase of a single item, or 25% off a purchase of at least $100, usable toward future purchases.

Case No.: 5:11-cv-05235-RMW, U.S. District Court Northern District of California. There is no settlement website for this case.

Case number 1:11-cv-00733, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. There is no settlement website for this case.

Case No. 19-cv-1723, Middle District of Florida. Pressman, Inc. and Pill Box Pines West, LLC  filed a class action complaint alleging that Smith Medical Partners, LLC and H.D. Smith, LLC  sent unsolicited advertisements by facsimile during the time period between September 26, 2013 and January 25, 2019. Plaintiffs allege that the Smith Faxes were sent without prior express invitation or permission or the required opt-out notice, allegedly in violation of the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Smith denies Plaintiffs’ allegations, raised defenses, and argues, among other things, that many of the Smith Faxes were not advertisements, that Smith had prior express invitation or permission from the fax recipients, and that facsimiles received electronically are not actionable. Any person who was sent, by or on behalf of H.D. Smith, LLC or Smith Medical Partners, LLC, one or more advertisement by fax from September 26, 2013, through January 25, 2019. Excluded from the settlement class are defendants, any parent, subsidiary, affiliate, or controlled person of the defendants, as well as the members, managers, officers, directors, agents, servants, or employees of Defendants, the immediate family members of such persons, and this Court.

Case No. 2:17-cv-00474, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. There is no settlement website for this case.

Case No 17-1506, US Circuit Court of Appeals - 4th Circuit. There is no settlement website for this case.

Case No. 07-CV-9227, Southern District of New York The Plaintiffs allege that It’s Just Lunch fraudulently induced clients who joined on or after October 15, 2001 into signing a membership contract. The Plaintiffs also allege that, in charging greater than $1,000 for one year’s worth of services in New York, It’s Just Lunch has (i) committed deceptive or unfair practices in violation of New York General Business Law §§ 349 and 394-c on or after October 15, 2001; and (ii) unjustly enriched itself by charging clients greater than $1,000 in New York. The certified class includes all IJL clients or former clients who signed a membership contract and joined It’s Just Lunch on or after October 15, 2001, if the clients did not obtain a refund of their payments to It’s Just Lunch and if they fall within certain time limits set by law. The certified class also includes all IJL clients in the State of New York who signed a membership contract on or after October 15, 2001 and who paid more than $1,000 for a year’s worth of services at the time of initial contracting and who did not obtain a refund of the amounts paid to It’s Just Lunch.

Case No. CV 12-09012 This settlement is a result of : Detaining people whose bail was less than $25,000 and who would not have been booked into jail in the first place, if not for their ICE hold (October 2010 – June 2014); detaining people after their criminal case finished, where their detainer was not supported by a removal order or ongoing removal proceedings (October 2010 – June 2014); and refusing to accept bail for people with ICE holds (October 2010 - October 2012). The Court has certified this case a group action (called a “class action”). You do not need to do anything else to become part of the lawsuit.

Plaintiffs brought suit against the California Public Employee's Retirement System (CalPERS) sale of long term care insurance to the class. The partial settlement only impacted the claims asserted against Towers Watson Co., Towers Perrin and Tillinghast-Towers Perrin (Towers) and there is currently no settlement with CalPERS. The lawsuit generally alleges that it was improper for CalPERS to impose an 85% rate increase. The lawsuit also alleges that the Towers Defendants negligently performed actuarial services for CalPERS relating to rate-setting at the inception of the program in 1995 and that this contributed to the 85% premium increase implemented by CalPERS 20 years later. The deadline for filing a claim form has passed. All outstanding checks as of January 12, 2019 will be voided.

Plaintiffs allege AMN and Kaiser failed to pay traveling nurses at the Kaiser Foundation Hospitals in California for all the time they worked before and after their scheduled shifts, such as time spent charting and other work-related activities. If you worked as a traveling nurse for AMN in one or more Kaiser facilities in California at any time between September 11, 2013 through December 27, 2018 you may be eligible for benefits.

Case No. 1:17-cv-00318, U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island. Please visit the settlement website for more information.

Plaintiffs alleged the sliding doors on certain Sienna vehicles are defective. If you own or lease, or previously owned, purchased, or leased certain Toyota Sienna vehiles, you could get benefits from a class action settlement.

Case No. 1:17cv6546, US District Court for the District of New Jersey. A settlement has been reached in this class action lawsuit. In this lawsuit, Plaintiffs allege that FMC violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by using an automated telephone dialing system and/or prerecorded voice to place unsolicited telemarketing calls to consumers without their express written consent. FMC denies that it violated the law or did anything wrong, and has asserted several defenses. The Court has not ruled on the merits of the claims or defenses. FMC has agreed to the proposed settlement to end this lawsuit.

Case No. 1:17cv6902, US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois You may be a class member if you visited a Six Flags theme park or waterpark in the United States during the period October 14, 2016 through September 28, 2017 and used a credit and/or debit card to make a purchase at the park and received a printed receipt.  Please visit the settlement website to view the specific parks and dates included in this settlement.

Plaintiffs alleged Quantum Emery LLC engaged in a fraudulent investment scheme resulting in financial losses to investors. All investors, including any and all of their respective successors-in-interest, who have invested in any Quantom or Quaneco offering on or after October 5, 2005 are eligible for class membership. The deadline for filing a claim has passed.

Case No. 6:13cv921 This class action seeks to recover damages suffered as a result of Avis Budget allegedly never providing the insurance policy promised in the contract. This class action alleges a “breach of contract,” and does not include anyone who was in a motor vehicle accident and submitted a claim for liability insurance or for UM protection. Avis Budget denies that they acted wrongly or that Class Members are entitled to money damages because of any breach of contract. If you were involved in a motor vehicle accident while renting the vehicle and submitted an insurance claim either for liability insurance or for UM, you may not be a Class Member. You may not be a Class Member whether Avis Budget covered the claim or even if the claim is merely outstanding or unresolved. However, if you did not submit an insurance claim – for instance, if you were not involved in a motor vehicle accident and thus did not submit any claim – then you may be a Class Member.

The lawsuit alleges that PVH Retail engaged in false, misleading and/or deceptive acts and/or practices in connection with the sale and/or advertisement of merchandise sold by PVH Retail at Arizona Tommy Hilfiger Outlet Stores in violation of Arizona’s Consumer Fraud Act, A.R.S. §§ 44-1521, et seq. The lawsuit also alleges that PVH Retail omitted, failed to disclose, and actively concealed that merchandise offered for sale at Arizona Tommy Hilfiger Outlet Stores was unique to Arizona Tommy Hilfiger Outlet Stores and not discounted from an original price. All individuals not otherwise excluded who, between August 30, 2017 and May 21, 2019, purchased one or more items from any Arizona Tommy Hilfiger Outlet Store which was not returned by you, on your behalf, or otherwise.

This case involves multiple data breaches occurring at Yahoo in 2013 through 2016, as well as data security intrusions occurring in early 2012.  If you had a Yahoo account between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2016, you are a settlement class member. If you received an emailed notice from the settlement administrator about this class action settlement addressed to you, then the settlement administrator has already determined that you are a settlement class member.