Active Cases

If you donated money to Gospel for Asia between January 1, 2009 and March 22, 2019, you could receive money from a class action settlement.  The proposed settlement of a class action lawsuit may affect your rights.  Read the information contained on this website carefully because it explains decisions and actions you must take now.

Case No. 2:16cv5127, U.S. District of New Jersey, Newark.

Case No.: 5:11-cv-05235-RMW, U.S. District Court Northern District of California. There is no settlement website for this case.

Case number 1:11-cv-00733, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. There is no settlement website for this case.

Plaintiffs in two suits alleged packaging on Freshmates wipes states wipes are "flushable," 'septic safe," and "safe for sewer and septic systems" despite the fact that wipes are no safe for flushing down a toilet and routinely damage or clog plumbing systems. If you are a purchaser of Charmin Freshmates Flushable Wipes between April 6, 2011 and November 26, 2018 you may be eligible to receive benefits from this settlement. The deadline for filing a claim has passed.

Plaintiffs alleged there were several defects on the Defendant's Power Pressure Cooker, including sudden steam and lid malfunctions. If you purchased a Power Pressure Cooker for personal use between March 1, 2013 and January 19, 2018 you may be eligible. The deadline for filing a claim has passed.

Case No. 2:17-cv-00474, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. There is no settlement website for this case.

Plaintiffs alleged Martha Steward Living Omnimedia, Inc. violated the Michigan's Preservation of Personal Privacy Act by disclosing information related to their customers' magazine subscriptions to third parties. If you purchased a subscription to Martha Stewart Living Magazine or Martha Stewart Weddings Magazine between July 31, 2010 and July 31, 2016, you may be a member of this class action settlement.

Case No 17-1506, US Circuit Court of Appeals - 4th Circuit. There is no settlement website for this case.

Plaintiffs alleged Gencor Nutrients violated consumer protection and warranty laws concerning products containing the ingredient Testofen®. The lawsuit contends that clinical studies do not support the marketing claims associated with products containing Testofen®. If you purchased between January 1, 2010 and May 14, 2018 you may be eligible for a benefit from a class action settlement. The deadline for filing a claim has passed.

Case No. 07-CV-9227, Southern District of New York The Plaintiffs allege that It’s Just Lunch fraudulently induced clients who joined on or after October 15, 2001 into signing a membership contract. The Plaintiffs also allege that, in charging greater than $1,000 for one year’s worth of services in New York, It’s Just Lunch has (i) committed deceptive or unfair practices in violation of New York General Business Law §§ 349 and 394-c on or after October 15, 2001; and (ii) unjustly enriched itself by charging clients greater than $1,000 in New York. The certified class includes all IJL clients or former clients who signed a membership contract and joined It’s Just Lunch on or after October 15, 2001, if the clients did not obtain a refund of their payments to It’s Just Lunch and if they fall within certain time limits set by law. The certified class also includes all IJL clients in the State of New York who signed a membership contract on or after October 15, 2001 and who paid more than $1,000 for a year’s worth of services at the time of initial contracting and who did not obtain a refund of the amounts paid to It’s Just Lunch.

Plaintiffs brought suit against the California Public Employee's Retirement System (CalPERS) sale of long term care insurance to the class. The partial settlement only impacted the claims asserted against Towers Watson Co., Towers Perrin and Tillinghast-Towers Perrin (Towers) and there is currently no settlement with CalPERS. The lawsuit generally alleges that it was improper for CalPERS to impose an 85% rate increase. The lawsuit also alleges that the Towers Defendants negligently performed actuarial services for CalPERS relating to rate-setting at the inception of the program in 1995 and that this contributed to the 85% premium increase implemented by CalPERS 20 years later. The deadline for filing a claim form has passed. All outstanding checks as of January 12, 2019 will be voided.

Plaintiffs alleged that Defendant Ally Financial Inc. (Ally) violated the legal rights of consumers by charging or permitting dealerships to charge impermissible documentary or dealer fees in connection with lease-end vehicle purchases surrounding option provisions in consumer leases. Ally agreed to pay each class member who returned a completed claim form in a timeline matter up to 100% of the documentary, dealer, or similar fee that was charged. The deadline for filing a claim form has passed.

Case No. 34-2017-00210831, Sacramento Superior Court. There is no settlement website for this case.

Plaintiffs allege AMN and Kaiser failed to pay traveling nurses at the Kaiser Foundation Hospitals in California for all the time they worked before and after their scheduled shifts, such as time spent charting and other work-related activities. If you worked as a traveling nurse for AMN in one or more Kaiser facilities in California at any time between September 11, 2013 through December 27, 2018 you may be eligible for benefits.

Case No. 1:17-cv-00318, U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island. Please visit the settlement website for more information.

Plaintiffs alleged the sliding doors on certain Sienna vehicles are defective. If you own or lease, or previously owned, purchased, or leased certain Toyota Sienna vehiles, you could get benefits from a class action settlement.

Plaintiffs alleged Quantum Emery LLC engaged in a fraudulent investment scheme resulting in financial losses to investors. All investors, including any and all of their respective successors-in-interest, who have invested in any Quantom or Quaneco offering on or after October 5, 2005 are eligible for class membership. The deadline for filing a claim has passed.

Plaintiffs alleged United Healthcare of Arizona and associated Defendants failed to comply with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the terms of various private sector-sponsored group health plans when processing claims for physical therapy befits and nonsurgical spinal decompression therapy, regardless of weather the decompression therapy was performed by a physical therapist. The deadline for filing a claim has passed.

You are an eligible recipient that can participate in this Judgment if (a) you are a California consumer (an individual consumer with a California billing zip code) who enrolled in a paid subscription with efax.com, MyFax.com and/or metrofax.com at any time between April 2012 and November 2016, (b) were charged for at least one automatically-renewed cycle, without sending or receiving a fax using efax.com, MyFax.com and/or metroFax.com and (c) have not previously received a refund for payment for eFax.com, MyFax.com and/or metroFax.com services.

Plaintiffs alleged Defendants violated the Chicago Residential Landlord and Tenant Ordinance (RLTO) by failing to attach to leases and renewals required RLTO Summary and/or Separate Summary containing the security deposit interest rates pursuant to RLTO Section 5-12-170. Class members include any persons who entered into a lease or a renewal at any property in Chicago owned and/or managed by the Defendants on or after December 28, 2015. The deadline for filing a claim has passed.

Plaintiffs alleged the Defendants committed violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) by overstating the amount of post-judgment interest owed by consumers in documents the Defendants filed with the courts and sent to consumers and third parties.

The lawsuit alleges that PVH Retail engaged in false, misleading and/or deceptive acts and/or practices in connection with the sale and/or advertisement of merchandise sold by PVH Retail at Arizona Tommy Hilfiger Outlet Stores in violation of Arizona’s Consumer Fraud Act, A.R.S. §§ 44-1521, et seq. The lawsuit also alleges that PVH Retail omitted, failed to disclose, and actively concealed that merchandise offered for sale at Arizona Tommy Hilfiger Outlet Stores was unique to Arizona Tommy Hilfiger Outlet Stores and not discounted from an original price. All individuals not otherwise excluded who, between August 30, 2017 and May 21, 2019, purchased one or more items from any Arizona Tommy Hilfiger Outlet Store which was not returned by you, on your behalf, or otherwise.

This case involves multiple data breaches occurring at Yahoo in 2013 through 2016, as well as data security intrusions occurring in early 2012.  If you had a Yahoo account between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2016, you are a settlement class member. If you received an emailed notice from the settlement administrator about this class action settlement addressed to you, then the settlement administrator has already determined that you are a settlement class member.